Skip to content
Ground Truth
Home Articles Method About

Analysis

Original findings, recomputed and cross-checked.

Each analysis assembles something no single study or press release contains — a cross-study table, a recomputed rate — from the primary sources. To guard against a coding error rather than a typo, every finding is built independently by two different AI models and reconciled against the source, with the disagreements published. The data lives in the page for you to check and reuse.

  • 5 Jul 2026 Analysis Benchmarks

    The scoreboard that can’t be drawn: what seven “AI-beats-clinician” health studies actually measured

    Seven headline studies say AI matches or beats clinicians in global health. Placed on one honest table, they report on six different scales, only one offers a fair AI-versus-human comparison, and exactly one measured whether a patient got better — it was null. An original, cross-checked dataset.


Ground Truth

An independent publication scrutinizing AI claims in global health. We trace every claim to its primary source and correct our own errors in public.

Read

  • All articles
  • Field guides
  • Editorial standard

Method

  • Independence
  • Corrections policy
  • Submit a tip or correction

© 2026 Ground Truth